[bwfcbecky]

Hiya, i'm new here, and i've seen two pianos, that i'm interested in. One is a Cramer, and one is a WH Barnes. I own both a Russell and Russell acoustic piano, which is a lovely little thing, and i also own a Roland digital piano, which is also a good piece of equipment. However, as I'm studying Music at AS, and hopefully, A2 level at college, I'd really like to buy a baby grand, something a little bit special. Are Cramer and WH Barnes good piano makers, and which is better?

I'd really appreciate it if someone would reply to this!

Best,
Becky. xxx
_________________
*Becky*
~The Reebok Rebel!~

[Barrie Heaton]

The Cramer would have been better made than the Barnes. However, the Barnes. could be in better condition than the Cramer depends on how well they have been cared for. I would get a tuner to look at the pianos

Barrie,
_________________
Barrie Heaton
Web Master UK Piano Page

[Gill the Piano]

To be brutal about it, a tall piano with long strings is far better than a short fat one with short fat strings. And a baby grand is only a short fat piano lying down... If you're serious about your music studies, you'd be far better off putting your money towards a good - preferably modern - workhorse of an upright (like a Yamaha - or Kawai, she added hastily, in case anyone gets upset... ) which will take whatever you care to throw at it. You'll get a better tone, particularly in the bass. Older small English grands often have Simplex actions, which are discussed elsewhere on this forum, and can give problems.
Most baby grands cost from fifteen hundred quid (round here), and that's for an elderly tired one! You could get a decent upright for that. Also, if you get a place of your own one day, it's far easier to house an upright than a grand.
You can always get the Bosendorfer Imperial (9'6" long) when you're a millionaire...