|
| Author |
Message |
mitch New Member

Joined: 20 Sep 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: Bechstein v Steinway |
|
|
I played on a 1951 Bechstein Grand Model L at the Piano Auction in Holborn, London earlier this month, (which has recently been reconditioned in Poland) and fell in love - but it was estimated to go for 8k-10k.
I can't quite afford this at the moment, (and so will have to keep saving) but had I had the money I would have probably gone for it, but have today read with interest an article on this Forum saying to stay away from any pianos reconditioned in Poland - and wonder whether this goes for all of them.......
Also - are Steinway / Bosendorfer "far" better pianos than Bechsteins? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PianoGuy Persistent Poster

Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 1335
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: Re: Bechstein v Steinway |
|
|
| mitch wrote: | I played on a 1951 Bechstein Grand Model L at the Piano Auction in Holborn, London earlier this month, (which has recently been reconditioned in Poland) and fell in love - but it was estimated to go for 8k-10k.
I can't quite afford this at the moment, (and so will have to keep saving) but had I had the money I would have probably gone for it, but have today read with interest an article on this Forum saying to stay away from any pianos reconditioned in Poland - and wonder whether this goes for all of them....... |
Most of them certainly.
There is a case for getting the cosmetic work done in Poland and the rest by someone who can impart a bit more finesse.
| mitch wrote: | | Also - are Steinway / Bosendorfer "far" better pianos than Bechsteins? |
Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Otto Regular Poster

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Wiltshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I swapped a Bechstein for a Steinway because I found it to be much better in almost every respect.
I certainly wouldn't willingly go back to the Bechstein. _________________ Otto
Last edited by Otto on Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ben_abbots Regular Poster

Joined: 07 Jul 2007 Posts: 11 Location: Chipping Norton
|
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: bechstein v. steinway |
|
|
having played fine examples of both makes, i can say that i personally much prefer a bechstein, challen or bluthner to a steinway, as the renner action especially on newer or reconditioned models always seems slightly unforgiving compared to the schwander action found on challens etc. the tone quality, though, is biblical!
incidentally, i play '20s jazz and romantic pieces (lizst, rach etc.)
i wonder if anyone with similar tastes prefers schwander actions?
ben |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|