UK Piano Page Piano Discussion Forums

Tony M 2007 · Member Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 3 Location: USA

We have decided to buy a piano for home use (both children play)...We are looking at the Yamaha C2 vs a Kawai RX-2...

The dealers in the US all say the same thing...When we go to Kawai, they say Yamaha is inferior to their product - especially with the "New" Millenium III Action...When we go to Yamaha, they say Kawai is inferior, Yamaha is made of wood and Kawai makes their parts from plastics??

Can someone please provide honest advice...Committing to spend US$18,000 is a big commitmment...Appreciate any honest and sincere advice we can get...
_________________
Thanks Tony M

sussexpianos · Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:15 pm Post subject:

I guess both grands are good, but you need to decide on the tone you want and the touch. Both have different tone and touch. Quality will be the same on both. Just for a small bit of info, Trinity College of London is a well respected music & arts college and nearly all the pianos are Kawai. But at the end of the day, its what you like the sound off.

Openwood · Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:15 pm Post subject:

A few years ago I knew nobody who had a Kawai piano but since then they have become much more popular. I've played a few and my experience was that there was nothing between them and Yamaha; they both seem to offer excellent build quality and good sound for less than their European counterparts. If you can afford a top of the range piano go European but if you want a very good affordable piano for home/institutional use I really believe you can't go wrong with either Kawai or Yamaha, but buy the best model you can afford. I know a few teachers who own C2s and they are very happy with them.

Openwood · Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:17 pm Post subject:

Tony M 2007 · Member Joined: 13 Nov 2007 Posts: 3 Location: USA

Openwood · Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject:

I'd say there are probably more Yamahas than Kawais in the UK at the mo. I have no evidence to back up this claim other than personal observation. Actually, if I were asked to provide yet more unfounded and therefore meaningless speculation on the subject I'd wager that there are probably more Yamahas than any other make of piano in the UK. How about that for a rash claim?

PianoGuy · Persistent Poster Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 1275

[quote="Tony M 2007]
Can someone please provide honest advice...Committing to spend US$18,000 is a big commitmment...Appreciate any honest and sincere advice we can get...[/quote]

With the RX series, Kawai have finally caught up with Yamaha. The action is a delight and the tuning instability which blighted Kawais of the past is totally absent.

It's all down to personal choice now!

superquark · Member Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 8 Location: England

I must have worked on dozens of Yamaha C series grands over the years. They are popular for a reason - great build quality, excellent reliability and a powerful sound all suit them to use in institutional and professional settings. There isn't much wrong with them, except perhaps, a sound that is not always suited to domestic use.

I have worked too on many Kawai RX series grands in recent years, and personally I prefer them. My opinion is that in terms of quality, there is almost nothing to choose. But I do prefer the action, which for me gives a more subtle touch, and mostly I prefer the sound - a slightly more "european" sound (whatever that means), and one which is not likely to overpower you in your home. Kawai also give a 10 year guarantee on all their acoustic pianos now (5 years parts and labour, another 5 years parts). I wouldn't recommend the Kawai GE/GM grands unless money is really tight, but the RX-2 and RX-3 in particular are superb at the price.

sussexpianos · Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:28 am Post subject:

The RX models are very good. I think Kawai are on their way to the top. I think Guild Hall are also getting some Kawais. Kawai make the Boston piano for Steinway, but I have been told that its not anyway near the quality of the Kawai. The rim is thinner, the actions are poor and there are other areas which don't come close to the quality of a Kawai grand. I wonder who designed the Boston? It was built to a price.

RWAS · Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:32 am Post subject:

I have recently acquired a new Kawai RX3 grand piano and I am delighted with it although it is still being "played in".
I had tried the slightly smaller RX2 model and was most impressed by its responsive action and singing tone.
The RX3, because of its length gives a more powerful bass response.
I previously owned a Boston GP178 which was a nice piano, but the Kawai has a brighter, more joyous sound with more sustain throughout its scale than the Boston.
I am unable to compare the Kawai RX3 with the Yahama C3.

I was more drawn to Kawai as a make because I believe that it is an innovative company and the new Millenium III action is evidence of that. The Shigeru Kawai range has also received international acclaim and if I should be able to upgrade it would be to one of those glorious instruments.

Ultimately the choice of a piano comes down to personal preference but I believe that we should be open-minded and judge the sound of each instrument on its own terms rather than comparing it to the "Steinway" sound or whatever.

Kind regards,

Robert.
_________________
I love the piano and its music.

sussexpianos · Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:34 am Post subject:

bigger is sometimes better Smile

Stuart · Regular Poster Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 20 Location: UK

About 2 years' ago I compared the RX2 to the C2 before buying an RX2. The RX2 I found warmer in tone and the touch is lighter. Having said that, it really is a matter of personal preference. They are both good - go with what you enjoy playing best.

I am happy with the RX2, save for a small elusive noise on some notes - the supplier is arranging for a Kawai technician to fix it and my tuner, with experience of selling Kawais, assures me that their post-sales service is good.

Will try to remember to update the forum with any siginificant developments with the RX2.

Openwood · Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:17 pm Post subject:

Stuart · Regular Poster Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 20 Location: UK

Sorry for the delay - life got in the way. Just a few notes, especially in the upper bass. My tuner listened hard and thought it was just as the hammer hit the string, he referred to it as metallic and also thought that whoever fixes it will either take five minutes or spend hours on it. Not a noise he has come across and he has sold Kawais and likes them. It is not a thud, nor a ping, nor a vibration. The best I can do is call it a slight action noise which if it were uniform across the keyboard might not be noticed, or might be thought to be a somewhat 'noisy action' by those with golden ears. It does not affect the touch and can be unnoticeable in playing, but Alberti basses on the 'wrong' notes cause it it to be audible. It affects about 4 -5 notes around an octave below middle C and 1 -3 notes an octave above middle C. Sorry to be so vague. Most of the time it doesn't worry me at all, but the piano is still under guarantee so it's worth pursuing.

Len · Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:59 am Post subject:

sussexpianos · Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject:

Len,
I tune for a few concert halls and they all have Yamaha pianos because they are good workhorses and the punters can hear the piano well due to its bright tone but, and this is just personal pref, the tone can be a little too bright for the home (esp. with wooden lam floors) so some people pref. a softer, more rounded tone for the home. You just need to remember that when you play the instrument, take into account the surrounds like soft furnishings, floor type, height of ceiling etc. Yamaha is a good brand name and a lot of people go for Yamaha because of it, there are many brands outs there which are worth a look at.

Len · Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject:

Hi - thanks; I figured that was it. This morning I got the chance to try out the Kawai RX-1 and RX-2 and know what you mean. The upper register of the Kawai is more mellow/smooth than the Yamaha C1 and C2, although not too significantly so. The Millenium III action was also very attractive in feel, although a bit light for me. Decisions, decisions...

Either way I'll be placing a carpet under the piano to absorb some of the sound - it will be sitting on a wooden floor.

My final visit before deciding will be to try a Reid-Sohn/Samick NSG series piano next week. Then I'll make my decision. It would be nice to have all three pianos next to each other to hear the difference, but that is wishful thinking! Smile

Cheers

Len
_________________
www.myspace.com/leonardng

mdw · Persistent Poster Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 145

I think Yamaha are also so popular because they are so heavily discounted. Does make you wonder what the numbers would be if they sold side by side with Kawai at the same price. Dont get me wrong they (Yamaha) are good kit but I think the price discount is the killer thing for most people that tips them one way or another. Plus Kawai should realy do a bit of PR rather than let Yamaha rule the roost!
The saying I heard the other day was "Never a bad one but never a great one either" which I guess is all that most people want. Mind you I guess he hadnt tried the B range when he made that comment Shocked

PianoGuy · Persistent Poster Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 1275

sussexpianos · Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:34 am Post subject:

The Samick NSG is a great piano which I sell a few off. Id try the 175 and the 186 as they are great sounding pianos. The 156 is good for its size as the body is fatter at the back. Id be interested to hear your comments on the NSG.