Extra keys

Recycled materials often are dry and stable, more affordable and at hand but their shapes sometimes challenge reuse.

namemfg. 1use
BasswoodTilia americanaa, e 6key planks, action parts 2large bright yellow medullary rays distinguish from European
BasswoodTilia cordataekey planks, action parts, core wood 5better strength and working properties but heavier than American
BeechFagus sylvaticaeaction rails, wrest planks, bridges 2easier to plane
BeechFagus grandifoliaabackposts, spacer blocks 3glued joints often split 7
BirchBetula spp.atrapwork, backposts, soundboard liners 3one kind smells bad like mold
CherryPrunus serotinaaaction rails 5used in larger squares
ChestnutCastanea dentataacore wood 2most common veneered corewood beginning around onset of blight
EbonyDiospyros spp.e,akey touch plates 2cheaper substitutes include dyed walnut and maple
ElmUlmus spp.abackposts, spacing blocks 2usual structural wood in uprights - old fashioned "select hardwood"
FirAbies albaecore wood, back posts 3European is stronger and heavier than brittle American species
GumLiquidambar styracifluaasolid case parts 2carved pieces grained to match more expensive case wood
MahoganySwietenia mahoganiie, asolid case parts, veneer, decorative molding, 2 action parts 4
OakQuercus robureaction rails, case sides 5rarely used in America except as veneer
PearPyrus communiseaction parts 5"Pear isn't as hard as hornbeam, but it is more pliable and takes a nice polish" (Turgan)
PoplarPopulus spp.e, acore wood 4light color and weight, unstable diffuse to ring porous hardwood with irregular grain
PoplarLiriodendron tulipiferaacore wood 2popular before and after chestnut
RosewoodDalbergia nigrae, aveneer, decorative molding 3most painted over veneer
Scots pinepinus silvestrisecore wood, back posts 2very easy to work
Spanish cedarcedrela spp.ecore wood 4smelly
SprucePicea spp.asounding boards, ribs, backposts, spacing blocks 2almost universal soundboard material
Sugar mapleAcer saccharinumaaction parts, rails, wrest planks, bridges 2
Sugar pinePinus lambertianaakey planks, 2 soundboard ribs 4available in wide boards with isolated knots
Swiss pinepicea abiesekey planks, sounding boards, back posts 2
SycamorePlantanus occidentalisabackposts, spacer blocks, belly rails 3peculiar to a couple midwestern makers
WalnutJuglans nigraasolid case parts, veneer, decorative moldings, 2 action rails, action brackets 5common reed organ case material
WalnutJuglans regiaesolid case parts, veneer, decorative moldings, 2 action brackets 5
White pinePinus strobusacase sides, 3 key planks 3cheaper, lighter, finer grain than sugar pine

Table 1: Wood found in old pianos


Force and motion requirements limit broader application of mechanical keyboard systems through materials and tolerances.

speciesspg
~12%
%t%r%vMOR_l
(MPa)
MOE_l
(GPa)
compr para
(MPa)
compr perp
(MPa)
pinus strobus 80.356.02.38.23.38.5333.0
pinus lambertiana0.365.62.97.93.18.2313.4
picea sitchensis0.367.54.311.53.69.9363.0
tilia americana0.379.36.615.86.010.1332.6
populus tremuloides0.386.73.511.55.88.1292.6
juglans cinerea0.386.43.410.65.68.1363.2
abies concolor0.397.03.39.84.010.3403.7
picea glauca0.407.13.811.03.89.2383.2
populus tremula 90.427.28.637
picea abies 100.427.02.07.510.5505.5
pseudotsuga menziesii (avg)0.487.34.511.68.612.2534.8
tilia cordata 90.487.65.39.97.1436.9
pinus silvestris0.507.74.012.39.811.854
swietenia macrophylla0.504.13.07.87.910.3478.5
ailanthus altissima0.5310.88.110.5367.8
juglans nigra0.557.85.512.810.111.6527.0
abies alba 110.5511.02.3
ulmus alata0.668.94.913.810.211.4478.5
fagus grandifolia0.6711.95.517.210.311.9507.0
quercus alba0.689.05.315.810.512.3517.4
acer saccharinum0.689.94.814.710.912.65410.1
quercus robur 90.708.94.59.710.05211.0
ostrya virginiana0.709.68.218.69.711.75410.3
fagus silvatica0.7210.95.211.812.6569.5
cornus florida0.7311.37.119.910.310.55313.2
diospyros virginiana0.7896.315.312.213.96317
dalbergia nigra0.810.713.0
pyrus communis 126.510.5

Table 2: Some mechanical properties of woods and their substitutions


Reuse only undamaged old screws.

Wood screw
nr.
tpiBasic screw
dia (mm)
dia. at base
of thread (mm)
Drill size
for shank
Drill size
for thread
Withdrawal load per
unit length (N/cm)
Max. lateral
load (N)
for hardwoodfor softwoodhardwoodsoftwood
0321.51.15256100405030
1281.91.44853130508040
2262.21.643511506011060
3242.51.939481807015080
4222.92.1324420080200110
5203.22.4304123090250130
6183.52.72836250100310160
7163.82.92332280110380190
8154.23.1191/8300120450230
9144.53.41529330130520270
10134.83.61027350140610320
11125.23.9523380150690370
12115.54.17/3219400160790420
135.84.4A16430170890470
14106.24.6D124501801000520
1696.85.1I45002001230650
177.15.49/327/325302101360710
1887.55.619/6415502201490780
197.85.95/16B5802301630850
2088.16.1PD6002401770930
2479.57.13/8L70028024101260

Table 3: Wood screw selection and use, adapted from Wood Handbook 13


Keyboard instrument technology developed alongside metal wire, although properties important to pitch remain within alloy types other details vary. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Cost and performance influence choice of wire for new installation the same way it did when timing in commerce and metallurgy determined the fortune of instrument makers.20, 21

Music is produced with smaller forces in light strung antique pianos and their hammer strike weights are lower than zones outlined by David Stanwood. 22, 23


    Table 1: Wood found in old pianos

  1. a = North American, e = European
  2. Common
  3. secondary
  4. special
  5. obsolete application
  6. p.154. Nalder, L. The Modern Piano. The Gresham Press. Old Woking, Surrey. 1927
  7. Some emphasis is placed on the unsuitability of beech for musical instruments due to somewhat high shrinkage figures. This aspect is acknowledged by makers in the past ("difficult to dry", Turgan, 1865), but the changes are usually compared without indicating the long time required which might be interpreted as a useful property, and suggests that the broken glue joints often observed in backposts of turn of the century American uprights were due to their improper seasoning. ("Owing to the important property the Beech has of not absorbing water readily, it is much used on the Continent for making shoes, and soles for shoes, these being far superior to any mande of other descriptions of wood." Laslett, Thomas. Timber and Timber Trees. Macmillan & Co. London, 1894)
  8. Table 2: Some mechanical properties of woods and their substitutions

  9. unless noted all cited from Green, Winandy, Kretschmann. Wood Handbook--Chapter 4--Mechanical Properties of Wood. FPL-GTR-113. March 1999
  10. The Swedish Hardwood Institute http://www.lovtrainstitutet.se/en/main.html
  11. Selection Vosges http://www.selection-vosges.com/en/foret/fiche-sapin.htm
  12. Rampart Guitars http://www.rampartguitars.com/sources%20of%20info.htm
  13. p175-178. Agriculture Handbook nr. 72. USGPO, Washington, D.C. 1955
  14. Chart 1: Tensile strength per unit area for specific wire diameters

  15. Newbury, Brian. Investigation of the Metallurgy of 19th Century Piano Wire by Non-Destructive Analytical Techniques. Research Proposal. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015.
  16. Cabre, Juan Mas. The Industrial Revolution and Piano Wire. Piano Technicians Journal, Kansas City, MO. July 2000.
  17. Wire Comparison Chart. L.D. Peters & Sons, New Rochelle, NY. 2002
  18. ASTM B227: Standard for Copper clad steel wire
  19. Swenson, Edward. Chronologically arranged wire tests. http://www.mozartpiano.com/wiretest.html
  20. Poletti, Paul. Scale Analysis. Purpose and Methodology. 1997 http://www.polettipiano.com/Media/scale.PDF
  21. Hand Tools in History. Center for the Study of Early Tools, The Davistown Museum. Liberty, ME
    http://www.davistownmuseum.org/TDMtoolHistory.htm
  22. Goodrich, C. E. Notes on the Wire Industry, from "Story of Washburn and Moen"
    http://www.assumption.edu/dept/history/95Fall97/Wire_Industry.html
  23. Chart 3: Three new hammer strike weight zones

  24. Hauser-Felberbaum, Annette E. and Ulrich Hauser. Über die Bedeutung des Hammers im Klavier- und Flügelbau. Systemische Musikwissenschaft, Festschrift Jobst Peter Fricke. Köln, 2003
    http://www.uni-koeln.de/phil-fak/muwi/fricke/229hauser.pdf
  25. Stanwood, David. Tools and Methods for Component Touch Weight Balancing. The Touch Designer's Tool Kit. Stanwood Piano Innovations Inc., Vineyard Haven, MA. 2000



This website is hosted for free by Freewebs.com - free website. Get your own Free Website now!